Volume 50 | Number 2 | April 2015

Abstract List

Joelle H. Fong Ph.D., Olivia S. Mitchell Ph.D., Benedict S. K. Koh Ph.D.


Objective

To examine whether disaggregated activities of daily living () limitations better predict the risk of nursing home admission compared to conventionally used disability counts.


Data Sources

We used panel data from the Health and Retirement Study () for years 1998–2010. The is a nationally representative survey of adults older than 50 years ( = 18,801).


Study Design

We fitted Cox regressions in a continuous time survival model with age at first nursing home admission as the outcome. Time‐varying disability types were the key explanatory variables.


Principal Findings

Of the six limitations, bathing difficulty emerged as the strongest predictor of subsequent nursing home placement across cohorts. Eating and dressing limitations were also influential in driving admissions among more recent cohorts. Using simple counts for analysis yielded similar adjusted s; however, the amount of explained variance doubled when we allowed the disability measures to time‐vary rather than remain static.


Conclusions

Looking beyond simple counts can provide health professionals insights into which specific disability types trigger long‐term nursing home use. Functional disabilities measured closer in time carry more prognostic power than static measures.