Volume 51 | Number 3 | June 2016

Abstract List

Ulrike Nimptsch M.P.H.


Objective

To investigate changes in comorbidity coding after the introduction of diagnosis related groups (s) based prospective payment and whether trends differ regarding specific comorbidities.


Data Sources

Nationwide administrative data ( statistics) from German acute care hospitals from 2005 to 2012.


Study Design

Observational study to analyze trends in comorbidity coding in patients hospitalized for common primary diseases and the effects on comorbidity‐related risk of in‐hospital death.


Extraction Methods

Comorbidity coding was operationalized by Elixhauser diagnosis groups. The analyses focused on adult patients hospitalized for the primary diseases of heart failure, stroke, and pneumonia, as well as hip fracture.


Principal Findings

When focusing the total frequency of diagnosis groups per record, an increase in depth of coding was observed. Between‐hospital variations in depth of coding were present throughout the observation period. Specific comorbidity increases were observed in 15 of the 31 diagnosis groups, and decreases in comorbidity were observed for 11 groups. In patients hospitalized for heart failure, shifts of comorbidity‐related risk of in‐hospital death occurred in nine diagnosis groups, in which eight groups were directed toward the null.


Conclusions

Comorbidity‐adjusted outcomes in longitudinal administrative data analyses may be biased by nonconstant risk over time, changes in completeness of coding, and between‐hospital variations in coding. Accounting for such issues is important when the respective observation period coincides with changes in the reimbursement system or other conditions that are likely to alter clinical coding practice.