Volume 53 | Number 4 | August 2018

Abstract List

Seung Ju Kim R.N., Kyu‐Tae Han Ph.D., Woorim Kim, Sun Jung Kim Ph.D., Eun‐Cheol Park M.D., Ph.D.


Objective

To explore the impact of mandatory adoption of diagnosis‐related groups (s) on the use of outpatient care in Korea.


Data Sources

National Health Claim data from 2,022 hospitals and 1,029,101 admission cases during 2011–2014: tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia operation, and hemorrhoidectomy.


Study Design

Outcome variables included probability of outpatient visit, number of outpatient visits, and outpatient medical expenditures within 30 days. Presurgery examination before hospitalization for surgery, including basic and other examination, was conducted to evaluate a possible shift in health care service. A difference‐in‐difference research design was used to evaluate the impact of the system on the use of outpatient care.


Principal Findings

Before the introduction of the system, 384,609 (91.1 percent) participants used an outpatient clinic either before or after hospitalization. In our study, the number of outpatient visits and outpatient medical expenditures within 30 days increased after mandatory adoption of the system. After adoption of the system, volume and costs for presurgery examinations increased before hospitalization.


Conclusion

We observed a spillover effect after mandatory adoption of the system. A future payment system should be designed for spillover effects, and the introduction of a new payment system that expands the ‐based reimbursement system should be considered.