Volume 43 | Number 3 | June 2008

Abstract List

Robert D. Lieberthal


Background

Access to high quality medical care is an important determinant of health outcomes, but the quality of care is difficult to determine.


Objective

To apply the methodology to determine an aggregate relative measure of hospital quality using individual process measures.


Design

Retrospective analysis of Medicare hospital data using the methodology.


Subjects

Four‐thousand‐two‐hundred‐seventeen acute care and critical access hospitals that report data to CMS' database.


Measures

Twenty quality measures reported in four categories: heart attack care, heart failure care, pneumonia care, and surgical infection prevention and five structural measures of hospital type.


Results

Relative hospital quality is tightly distributed, with outliers of both very high and very low quality. The best indicators of hospital quality are for heart failure and and for heart attack. Additionally, teaching status is an important indicator of higher quality of care.


Conclusions

allows us to rank hospitals with respect to quality of care using process measures and demographic attributes of the hospitals. This method is an alternative to the use of clinical outcome measures in measuring hospital quality. Hospital quality measures should take into account the differential value of different quality indicators, including hospital “demographic” variables.